« Garneau Capitulates | Main | Getting a Free Ride »
Monday
Feb252013

The Garneau Challenge

Poor Marc Garneau, he wanted a one on one debate with Justin Trudeau and Trudeau turned him down. That was a smart move on Trudeau’s part, dumb one on Garneau’s.

While it’s true many people would like to know where Trudeau stands on a variety of issues, there is no reason for him to get involved in a one-on-one debate. Right now he is the front-runner and he has the most to lose with such a format.

If Trudeau is ahead what point is there in accepting such a challenge? It would put him at risk of making a mistake or in this case having Garneau prove to the public and media (those that don’t already suspect it) that Trudeau is “policy light.” There is simply no upside for Trudeau in accepting such a challenge.

In addition, if he had accepted the Garneau challenge, Trudeau would have indicated to the other challengers, delegates and registered leadership voters that he was concerned about Garneau’s momentum and that he needed the debate to knock Garneau down a peg. Accepting would have raised Garneau to equal status as a front-runner, something he is clearly not at this time.

Trudeau also had to look beyond the debate as well. Losing a debate to Garneau would have given the "anyone but Trudeau" folks, as well as the supporters of other candidates, someone to rally around to stop the Trudeau juggernaut. It certainly wasn’t in Trudeau’s interest to risk providing that opportunity.

As for Marc Garneau, outside of the temporary blip in media interest that his press release caused, did he seriously think Trudeau would accept? Such a move also signals that Garneau just might be getting a bit desperate that he hasn’t closed the gap on Trudeau, either in supporter numbers or dollars raised.

Garneau’s challenge to a one-on-one with Trudeau also brings into question whether or not Garneau is a team player. How does he think the other leadership challengers will view his wanting to bypass them? If he is so willing to insult them (and their supporters) by wanting to bypass them at this stage of the leadership race, does he still expect their support later on? Win or lose he still has to work with them in the future.

Certainly Garneau’s challenge provided a few minutes of interest in what so far has been a pretty dull leadership race, but it went nowhere. Did the challenge help Garneau move ahead in the contest? I doubt it; instead he might have alienated more supporters than he gained.

References (7)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Hi, this essay is despite the small, but rich in content. Reverie verbiage. If you want to see details:Hollister Online Shop
  • Response
    Response: lancel pas cher
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics
  • Response
    Response: ugg rylan
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics
  • Response
    Response: womens Ugg
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics
  • Response
    Response: longchamp outlet
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics
  • Response
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics
  • Response
    Response: Hollister
    The Garneau Challenge - BLOG - A look at Canadian politics,ეს სტატია დაიწერა ზუსტი თუმცა, თუ გვინდა, რომ თემაზე შეგიძლიათ აქ:Hollister,http://hollister-france1.weebly.com/1/category/hollister/1.html

Reader Comments (3)

Hmmm perhaps junior Trudeau is not so smart.
It would take courage but Mr Garneau could debate an "empty chair" or "empty hair"
Would be a game changer "who dares wins"
What has Mr Garneau got to lose?
JMO Bubba Brown

February 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterBubba Brown

Well, first off, there is no" Liberal" leadership race. There is however a cynical charade disguised as a leadership race, which in reality is nothing more than a coronation of a former PM's vacuous, undeserving kid. Trudeau No.2, or No.2 as I like to call him is an arrogant and stupid man/child, but his handlers are not stupid enough to get into a debate about policy with another so called "leadership candidate". NO.2 just has to stick to his handlers carefully crafted scripts, put on his best substitute grade 8 drama teacher act and voila, the "new Liberal leader". The only reason No.2 wins? Because some people labour under the ridiculous pretense that all that is required for the role of leader, or God forbid PM, is to share the name of a horrendous past PM. Hey, when you're desperately shallow and superficial and standing on the abyss of total irrelevancy why not find the dumbest most unsuitable candidate to lead you into that abyss.

February 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterSean M

As someone who lives in Ontario and before in Quebec, I think that the Liberals must seriously hate the West to even consider electing a second Trudeau. Talk about rubbing their noses in it..

February 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterNicola Timmerman

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>